Personal InjurySeptember 2, 2021•5 min read

Is Vehicle Technology Preventing Accidents or Causing Distractions?

Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr.
By Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr.
Trial Counsel & Strategic Advisor • University of Notre Dame '70

Automakers continue to introduce advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and large dashboard touchscreens intended to improve safety. However, complex technology can introduce new hazards on Connecticut roadways.

The Cognitive Distraction Hazard

According to NHTSA, human error contributes to 94% of motor vehicle crashes. While hands-free technology eliminates manual phone holding, it does not eliminate cognitive distraction. A driver interacting with complex screen menus or voice prompts still experiences reduced hazard awareness.

Dashboard Screen Glare & Inattention

Large infotainment displays require drivers to take their eyes off the road for several critical seconds. At 55 MPH, looking away for 4 seconds means traveling the length of a football field blind.

If you were injured in a collision caused by a distracted driver operating complex vehicle tech, Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr. can evaluate the crash dynamics and phone/telematics data for your case.

Have a Connecticut Case Involving Severe Auto / Truck Accident?

Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr. personally evaluates case inquiries related to this subject. Submit your details to open a pre-configured confidential case dossier.

Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr.

About Attorney Richard T. Meehan Jr.

Board-Certified Civil Trial Advocate with over 45 years of Connecticut courtroom mastery. Alumnus of the University of Notre Dame and UConn School of Law. Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.

Univ. of Notre Dame '70

Continue Reading Other Case Articles

View Full Directory
Dental MalpracticeAugust 19, 2026

Permanent Tongue & Lip Numbness After Wisdom Tooth Extraction: CT Nerve Injury Claims

Permanent numbness, burning pain, or loss of taste following lower wisdom tooth extraction or implant surgery is frequently caused by preventable surgical trauma to the lingual or inferior alveolar nerve.

Read Article
Dental MalpracticeJuly 12, 2026

Filing a Dental Malpractice Lawsuit in Connecticut: C.G.S. § 52-190a & Statute of Limitations

Connecticut imposes strict statutory hurdles on dental malpractice plaintiffs, including a two-year filing window under C.G.S. § 52-584 and a mandatory pre-suit expert opinion letter under C.G.S. § 52-190a.

Read Article
Dental MalpracticeMay 28, 2026

Failed Dental Implants & Maxillary Sinus Perforations: When Surgery Becomes Malpractice

Placing dental implants or performing upper molar extractions without adequate 3D bone assessment can result in implants migrating into the maxillary sinus cavity, chronic oroantral fistulas, or inferior alveolar nerve crushing.

Read Article